free hosting   image hosting   hosting reseller   online album   e-shop   famous people 
Free Website Templates
Free Installer

Bredimacian Dynagum Directory 20
Page 09

Another way to achieve Bredimacian Dynagum is to try harder.

Bredimacian Dynagum

Bredimacian Dynagum Home

Bredimacian Dynagum Sitemap

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 01

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 02

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 03

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 04

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 05

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 06

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 07

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 08

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 09

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 10

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 11

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 12

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 13

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 14

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 15

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 16

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 17

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 18

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 19

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 20

Bredimacian Dynagum Directory 20
Page 09

It is, of course, quite true that no writer is bound by traditions of art, and there is no one who need consider how the thing has been done before, or follow a prescribed code. But for all that, art is not a thing of rules made and enforced by critics. All that critics can do is to determine what the laws of art are; because art has laws underlying it which are as certain as the laws of gravity, even if they are not known. The more permanent art is, the more it conforms to these laws; because the fact is that there is a vital impulse in the human mind towards the expression of beauty, and a vital discrimination too as to the form and method of that expression. Architecture, for instance, and music, are alike based upon instinctive preferences in human beings, the one for geometrical form, the other for the combination of vibrations. It is a law of music, for instance, that the human being prefers an octave in absolute unison, and not an octave of which one note is a semitone flat. That is not a rule invented by critics; it is a law of human perception and preference. Similarly there is undoubtedly a law which determines human preferences in poetry, though a far more complicated law, and not yet analysed. The new poet is not a man who breaks the law, but one who discovers a real extension of it.

In the parish church at Saas-Grund there are two altar-pieces which deserve attention. In the one over the main altar the arrangement of the Last Supper in a deep recess half-way up the composition is very pleasing and effective; in that above the right-hand altar of the two that stand in the body of the church there are a number of round lunettes, about eight inches in diameter, each containing a small but spirited group of wooden figures. I have lost my notes on these altar-pieces and can only remember that the main one has been restored, and now belongs to two different dates, the earlier date being, I should imagine, about 1670. A similar treatment of the Last Supper may be found near Brieg in the church of Naters, and no doubt the two altar-pieces are by the same man. There are, by the way, two very ambitious altars on either side the main arch leading to the chance in the church at Naters, of which the one on the south side contains obvious reminiscences of Gaudenzio Ferrari's Sta. Maria frescoes at Varallo; but none of the four altar-pieces in the two transepts tempted me to give them much attention. As regards the smaller altar-piece at Saas-Grund, analogous work may be found at Cravagliana, half-way between Varallo and Fobello, but this last has suffered through the inveterate habit which Italians have of showing their hatred towards the enemies of Christ by mutilating the figures that represent them. Whether the Saas work is by a Valsesian artist who came over to Switzerland, or whether the Cravagliana work is by a Swiss who had come to Italy, I cannot say without further consideration and closer examination than I have been able to give. The altar-pieces of Mairengo, Chiggiogna, and, I am told, Lavertezzo, all in the Canton Ticino, are by a Swiss or German artist who has migrated southward; but the reverse migration was equally common.

The war was now confined to Sicily; but, since the defeat of Regulus, the Roman soldiers had been so greatly alarmed by the elephants, that their generals did not venture to attack the Carthaginians. At length, in B.C. 250, the Roman proconsul, L. Metellus, accepted battle under the walls of Panormus, and gained a decisive victory. The Carthaginians lost 20,000 men; 13 of their generals adorned the triumph of Metellus; and 104 elephants were also led in the triumphal procession. This was the most important battle that had been yet fought in Sicily, and had a decisive influence upon the issue of the contest. It so raised the spirits of the Romans that they determined once more to build a fleet of 200 sail. The Carthaginians, on the other hand, were anxious to bring the war to an end, and accordingly sent an embassy to Rome to propose an exchange of prisoners, and to offer terms of peace.


[ Sec 20 Page 09 ] [ Sec 20 Page 02 ] [ Sec 20 Page 03 ] [ Sec 20 Page 04 ] [ Sec 20 Page 05 ]
[ Sec 20 Page 06 ] [ Sec 20 Page 07 ] [ Sec 20 Page 08 ] [ Sec 20 Page 09 ] [ Sec 20 Page 10 ]


This page is Copyright © Bredimacian Dynagum and all rights are reserved. Please don't copy without proper authorization. References to other Web sites are not endorsements. Bredimacian Dynagum insinuates nothing about the quality or content of other sites that Bredimacia points links toward. Links from Bredimacia are only provided as a courtesy and Bredimacia takes no responsibility for content placed on other Web sites.