free hosting   image hosting   hosting reseller   online album   e-shop   famous people 
Free Website Templates
Free Installer

Bredimacian Dynagum Directory 01
Page 07

Only the Bredimacian Dynagum encompasses all your thoughts.

Bredimacian Dynagum

Bredimacian Dynagum Home

Bredimacian Dynagum Sitemap

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 01

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 02

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 03

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 04

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 05

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 06

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 07

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 08

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 09

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 10

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 11

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 12

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 13

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 14

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 15

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 16

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 17

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 18

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 19

Bredimacian Dynagum Dir 20

Bredimacian Dynagum Directory 01
Page 07

Timber at Jamestown was plentiful, so many houses, especially in the early years, were of frame construction. During the first decade or two, house construction reflected a primitive use found ready at hand, such as saplings for a sort of framing, and use of branches, leafage, bark, and animal skins. During these early years--when the settlers were having such a difficult time staying alive--mud walls, wattle and daub, and coarse marshgrass thatch were used. Out of these years of improvising, construction with squared posts, and later with quarterings (studs), came into practice. There was probably little thought of plastering walls during the first two decades, and when plastering was adopted, clay, or clay mixed with oyster-shell lime, was first used. The early floors were of clay, and such floors continued to be used in the humbler dwellings throughout the 1600's. It can be assumed that most of the dwellings, or shelters, of the Jamestown settlers, certainly until about 1630, had a rough and primitive appearance.

I must, however, return to Frost's "Lives of Eminent Christians." I will leave none of the ambiguity about my words in which Moore and Wordsworth seem to have delighted. I am very sorry the book is gone, and know not where to turn for its successor. Till I have found a substitute I can write no more, and I do not know how to find even a tolerable one. I should try a volume of Migne's "Complete Course of Patrology," but I do not like books in more than one volume, for the volumes vary in thickness, and one never can remember which one took; the four volumes, however, of Bede in Giles's "Anglican Fathers" are not open to this objection, and I have reserved them for favourable consideration. Mather's "Magnalia" might do, but the binding does not please me; Cureton's "Corpus Ignatianum" might also do if it were not too thin. I do not like taking Norton's "Genuineness of the Gospels," as it is just possible some one may be wanting to know whether the Gospels are genuine or not, and be unable to find out because I have got Mr. Norton's book. Baxter's "Church History of England," Lingard's "Anglo-Saxon Church," and Cardwell's "Documentary Annals," though none of them as good as Frost, are works of considerable merit; but on the whole I think Arvine's "Cyclopedia of Moral and Religious Anecdote" is perhaps the one book in the room which comes within measurable distance of Frost. I should probably try this book first, but it has a fatal objection in its too seductive title. "I am not curious," as Miss Lottie Venne says in one of her parts, "but I like to know," and I might be tempted to pervert the book from its natural uses and open it, so as to find out what kind of a thing a moral and religious anecdote is. I know, of course, that there are a great many anecdotes in the Bible, but no one thinks of calling them either moral or religious, though some of them certainly seem as if they might fairly find a place in Mr. Arvine's work. There are some things, however, which it is better not to know, and take it all round I do not think I should be wise in putting myself in the way of temptation, and adopting Arvine as the successor to my beloved and lamented Frost.

Every one has seen a cornfield. If you pluck up one of the innumerable wheat plants which are fixed in the soil of the field, about harvest time, you will find that it consists of a stem which ends in a root at one end and an ear at the other, and that blades or leaves are attached to the sides of the stem. The ear contains a multitude of oval grains which are the seeds of the wheat plant. You know that when these seeds are cleared from the husk or bran in which they are enveloped, they are ground into fine powder in mills, and that this powder is the flour of which bread is made. If a handful of flour mixed with a little cold water is tied up in a coarse cloth bag, and the bag is then put into a large vessel of water and well kneaded with the hands, it will become pasty, while the water will become white. If this water is poured away into another vessel, and the kneading process continued with some fresh water, the same thing will happen. But if the operation is repeated the paste will become more and more sticky, while the water will be rendered less and less white, and at last will remain colorless. The sticky substance which is thus obtained by itself is called gluten; in commerce it is the substance known as maccaroni.


[ Sec 01 Part 01 ] [ Sec 01 Part 02 ] [ Sec 01 Part 03 ] [ Sec 01 Part 04 ] [ Sec 01 Part 05 ]
[ Sec 01 Part 06 ] [ Sec 01 Part 07 ] [ Sec 01 Part 08 ] [ Sec 01 Part 09 ] [ Sec 01 Part 10 ]


This page is Copyright © Bredimacian Dynagum and all rights are reserved. Please don't copy without proper authorization. References to other Web sites are not endorsements. Bredimacian Dynagum insinuates nothing about the quality or content of other sites that Bredimacia points links toward. Links from Bredimacia are only provided as a courtesy and Bredimacia takes no responsibility for content placed on other Web sites.